The Will to Resist

Case Study: When “Nobody Can Agree” Is Just Bad Aggregation


Someone Asked Reddit Which Sequels Are Harder Than the Original Games, and According to TheGamer, “nobody could agree.”

That’s not what happened.

What actually happened is something far more boring — and far more common: a clear question got answered, then buried under noise.


The Original Question (Clear, Focused, Mechanical)

Which sequels are significantly more difficult than the first title?

The OP even provided a benchmark example: X-COM: Terror From the Deep — same mechanics, harsher environment, veterans punished.

That establishes clear criteria:

Not vibes. Not DLC. Not “it felt harder when I was twelve.”


What Reddit Actually Did

Out of ~160 comments, the thread split cleanly:

These appeared repeatedly, with little disagreement.

The thread slowly drifted into:

At that point, people weren’t answering the same question anymore — but TheGamer counted that as disagreement.


Noise Is Not Disagreement

People weren’t split on whether DMC3 NA or Lost Levels were harder sequels. They were talking past each other about:

That’s not “nobody agreeing.” That’s lack of moderation by definition.


The Troll That Proved the Point

To test the waters, I posted a single line:

Dark Souls 2. And not in the way people like to admit.

No elaboration. No insults. No follow-ups.

Predictably:

I didn’t reply.

That comment was later deleted — not rebutted. Username apparently made mods itchy.

Which is fine. Deletion is still data.


Conclusion

This isn’t “generations crying because games are hard.”

It’s:

Reddit didn’t fail to answer the question. It failed to stay on it.

And if a joke with structure gets removed faster than bad faith essays? That tells you everything you need to know about where discourse goes to die.

So yeah.

Fuck Reddit.

Filed after review. Logged for future reference. Blog over.