The Will to Resist

🧾 Dept. of Petty Affairs — Docket #420: The Sprouts Availability Paradox


Filed by: Jerry “The Ankle Biter” Silverhand · Tribunal Chair (DPA)

(Cross-indexed under : Broke Doctrine — Function & Chill Addenda)


Summary

When you show up, they add more shifts. When you grind, they call you dependable. When you rest, they call you “hard to reach.” It’s the workplace version of a slot machine that only pays in exhaustion.


Findings

So you start to wonder: If I keep saying yes, am I earning respect — or teaching them I don’t need rest?


Doctrine

Every yes spends a piece of you; every no rebuilds what’s left.

Boundaries aren’t rebellion — they’re calibration. Take shifts when they serve the mission. Decline when they threaten the rhythm.

You can’t pour peace from an empty furnace.


🧭 The 3-Beat Test (Sidebar Doctrine)

Before saying yes, run the three-beat scan:

  1. Need — Does this shift genuinely help you progress or pay what matters?
  2. Capacity — Can you take it without stealing energy from tomorrow?
  3. Control — Does this decision build your independence or their dependence on you?

If any beat fails, decline with grace. Yes is a currency; spend it like you earned it.


Post-Shift Addendum: The Law of Reliable Orbit

Managers don’t conspire; they calculate. They trust who shows up. And when you’re steady, their system bends around you. You’re not the villain — you’re the constant. But constants get pulled toward the center until they learn to adjust their orbit.

Reliability without reachability: that’s the balance. You keep gravity — but avoid the burn.


Closing Note

They call it “availability,” but what they really want is permission to forget you’re human. Keep that permission on a short leash.

Filed from a day off politely reclaimed.


#sprouts #glitchcouncil #dpa #brokedoctrine #functionandchill #boundaries #furnacelogic