The Will to Resist

Dept. of Petty Affairs — Tribunal Hearing #010


Case: Walmart v. Competence (Part II)

Filed under: Polite Execution Doctrine


Opening Statement

The Boss didn’t storm the gates. He knocked politely. Issue laid plain:

“I ordered Diet. You sent Regular. I am diabetic.”

Clear. Simple. Life and death wrapped in orange fizz.


Exhibit A: The Dance of Refunds

Walmart’s frontline tried their script shuffle:

But the Boss didn’t blink. No escalation, no raised tone. Just steady correction:

“I don’t want a refund. I want this done right.”*



Exhibit B: The Turning Point

Cornered by courtesy, they cracked. Out came the fallback treasure chest: A $10 promo code.


Not much for them, but principle weighed more than the number. One cut, one bend of the system, and the ledger balanced.


Mr. Catford bit down hard: “Symbolic blood tastes the sweetest.”


Verdict

This Tribunal rules in favor of the Plaintiff: Boris Thuginski, Department of Petty Affairs.



Graffiti on the Courtroom Wall

"Wouldn’t be mad and pocket a $10 coupon if you’d be competent."


Closing Note

Some would nuke the order. Some would demand blood. The Dept. of Petty Affairs moves quieter—correcting errors with precision cuts. For Walmart, it was a code. For us, it was proof: the scalpel works better than the hammer.


Judgment: Clean Cut Confirmed.


🔗 Linked Dockets:


#DeptOfPettyAffairs #Tribunal #PoliteExecution #CleanCut #WalmartSaga #PettyPower #GremlinRisitas #BookOfBoris #GraffitiOfTheReckoning